Al-Ahram Weekly On-line
27 Aug. - 2 Sep. 1998
Issue No.392
Published in Cairo by AL-AHRAM established in 1875 Current issue | Previous issue | Site map

A stress on international legality

Mubarak


In reacting to the US strikes, Cairo chose to navigate a cautious course while rejecting Sudanese claims of involvement, writes Nevine Khalil

Flags

Battling terrorism, or a case of victimisation?

America's decision to bomb sites in Afghanistan, and a pharmaceutical factory in Khartoum, has sharply split international opinion.

Washington has yet to provide any substantial evidence in support of its claim that the Sudanese factory was engaged in the production of chemical weapons, an omission that has added fuel to the fire.

Al-Ahram Weekly assesses the fall out from last Thursday's American strikes.

If no consensus has emerged one thing, at least, is certain: the ramifications of America's unilateral decision to bomb have not yet to been fully felt

Cairo shocked
by attack on Khartoum

The US strike against Sudan has left Egypt extremely concerned, writes Dina Ezzat
Salt in the wound
Opposition parties, and a great many Egyptians, were outraged by the US attack on Khartoum. Fatemah Farag reports
'Clinton destroys, we build'
Sudan Mohamed Khaled investigates the repercussions of a US attack that left Sudan seething with anger
Anger in the Arab world

The Arab League, reflecting a united position by its 22 member states, threw its weight behind Sudan. Rasha Saad reviews the range of Arab reaction


No chorus of disapproval
While condemnation of American 'arrogance' abounds, the verdict is by no means unanimous, writes Gamal Nkrumah
American connection

Laden Osama Bin Laden, once hailed as a freedom fighter by the CIA, is now public enemy number one. Khaled Dawoud writes on the inevitable demonising of Bin Laden

Gama'a ups the ante
Security sources are taking seriously a threat by Al-Gama'a Al-Islamiya to retaliate against the US. Ahmed Moussa and Khaled Dawoud report
Taliban's change of heart
After threatening war against Jews and Americans, Osama Bin Laden is quoted as saying he will not target US interests from Taliban-controlled areas in Afghanistan. Fatemah Farag reviews a rapidly-changing situation
No end in sight
The US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania have been bombed and America has retaliated. What next? Mervat Diab examines possible scenarios
Cartoon by Fathi
Hostage to expansion
Osama Bin Laden may well end up a pawn in the complex negotiations between Washington and the Taliban, argues Yehya Ghanem

A mirage mis-named strategic depth
Squandered opportunities, mismanagement, incalculable na•veté: the worst, though, is yet to come. Eqbal Ahmad on the ramifications of Pakistan's Afghan policy