![]() |
Al-Ahram Weekly On-line 5 - 11 April 2001 Issue No.528 |
||
| Published in Cairo by AL-AHRAM established in 1875 | Current issue | Previous issue | Site map | ||
Despair: Israel's ultimate weapon
The facts have been established, and the master plan has found its executor. Jeff Halper* comments on efforts to eradicate hope
"A comprehensive agreement is undoubtedly out of the question now. For only after total despair on the part of the Arabs, despair that will come not only from the failure of the disturbances and the attempt of rebellion, but also as a consequence of our growth in the country, may the Arabs possibly acquiesce to a Jewish Eretz Israel." --- David Ben-Gurion, 1936 ---The shoe has fallen, the orders have been given. We all wait: Israel's final push to "break" the Palestinians is about to commence. This is what Sharon was elected for; this is what he has been waiting for these past 53 and more years.
One obstacle stood in the way of Israel's National Unity government, which includes Nobel laureate Shimon Peres as foreign minister and Nathan Sharansky, the Soviet-Jewish human rights hero, as deputy prime minister. It needed the blessing of President George Bush. Sharon was the first Middle East leader to visit the White House after the US election (his first order of business was to urge Bush not to invite Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat). Sharon set out his agenda before the new government: bringing "security" to Israel's citizens; ending Palestinian "terrorism" and, because he believes peace is impossible, perhaps negotiating an "interim" agreement with the Palestinians.
All this is code for two underlying policies. First, breaking Palestinian resistance once and for all and forcing the Palestinians to accept a mini-state on half of the West Bank and Gaza. The mini-state is necessary to relieve Israel of having to grant citizenship to some three million inhabitants of the occupied territories, but it will be far from viable or truly sovereign. It will have no territorial contiguity, being squeezed between Israeli settlements, bypass roads, and military checkpoints and facilities. It will have no borders, being completely encircled by Israel, and no control of border crossings. It will be unable to develop a viable economy, its people remaining casual labourers forever dependent upon the Israeli economy. The second policy consists of reverting to the familiar tactics of delaying negotiations so as to create additional "facts on the ground," thus prejudicing the very negotiating process itself. The bottom line is that the Palestinians better accept this "reality" -- or else; it is a choice between occupation by consent, or absolute suppression.
What Sharon needed from Bush, then, was permission to suppress ruthlessly any Palestinian resistance to the military occupation. This he received, with one proviso: Do not do anything that "embarrasses" the United States. Do not expect, then, US-made Apache helicopters to attack Hebron, as they did Beit Jala and Gaza. Less visible means will be employed; a more extensive campaign of assassinations of Palestinian leaders and grassroots activists; surgical "operations" to "punish" the people and to "clear" agricultural land and urban neighbourhoods (watch what has happened in the Palestinian neighbourhood of Abu Sneineh in Hebron, where shots were apparently fired that killed an Israeli infant); reverting to bureaucratic methods, such as house demolition orders and land expropriation measures; massive settlement expansion and road-building; "painful" sanctions on the PA, and more.
All this will be cast, of course, as justified "responses" to terrorism. After all, Sharon was elected to bring personal security back to the Israeli public. But this cynically conceals the major goal of the Sharon-Peres government: creating such despair among the Palestinians that they will finally submit to Israeli dictates. Signs of this proactive policy -- not mere reactions following Palestinian actions -- are already evident. Just recently, the Jerusalem Municipality issued dozens of demolition orders, and the Israeli Civil Administration is doing the same for the West Bank and Gaza. Settlements are being expanded; the government has announced its intent to build a new city in the Etzion Bloc (Giva'ot) with 6,000 housing units in the first stage. Hundreds of acres of farm and horticultural land are being cleared for a massive "bypass road" near Turkumiyya, close to Hebron. And much more. All that was needed was the spark -- the attacks on Israeli civilians -- to jump-start the Campaign of Despair. Israel is again the victim with no responsibility, able to blame the Palestinians for the "violence." Meanwhile, the United States is let off the hook.
State terrorism on a scale we have not seen before, coupled with creating massive "facts" on the ground and perhaps causing the collapse of the PA, will now be employed to break Palestinian resistance once and for all. What unites Sharon and Peres is the belief that Israel can win. The US -- and Congress in particular, Israel's trump card -- is unwavering in its total support. Europe, more critical, has no independent policy apart from the US. The UN is neutralised by the US as an effective force. The Arab countries will give the Palestinians only lip service. Nothing will prevent Israel from either creating facts or brow-beating the Palestinians. Indeed, the only countervailing force at this time seems to be the Palestinian street. Here, assassinations and punishment (siege until hunger, preventing people from working, house demolition, land expropriation, mass arrests, constant harassment, and the extensive use of undercover police to undermine social solidarity) are intended to do their part.
Sharon hopes to fulfil his mentor's dream of utterly defeating the Palestinians and taking possession of the entire land of Israel. In a famous article entitled "The Iron Wall," published in 1923, Ze'ev Jabotinsky, the founder of Revisionist Zionism (who described his attitude towards the Arabs as one of "polite indifference"), set forth the platform of the present National Unity government. "Every indigenous people," he wrote, "will resist alien settlers as long as they see any hope of ridding themselves of the danger of foreign settlement. This is how the Arabs will behave and go on behaving so long as they possess a gleam of hope that they can prevent 'Palestine' from becoming the Land of Israel." The sole way to an agreement, then, is "through the iron wall, that is to say, the establishment in Palestine of a force that will in no way be influenced by Arab pressure ... A voluntary agreement is unattainable... We must either suspend our settlement efforts or continue them without paying attention to the mood of the natives. Settlement can thus develop under the protection of a force that is not dependent on the local population, behind an iron wall which they will be powerless to break down."
After 34 years of occupation, including 24 years following Sharon's 1977 "master plan" for annexing the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza, the iron wall is nearing completion. The "facts" have been established, the master plan almost concluded. All that remains is to extinguish that "gleam of hope" among the Palestinians that they might eke out a small, but viable, independent state in 22 per cent of the land of historical Palestine. The conquest and consolidation have been accomplished; only the despair remains that will allow Israel to control the Greater Land of Israel while getting rid of Palestinians through forcing a bantustan upon them. Has the world seen the last of apartheid? The next few weeks and months will tell. And it will all be happening in front of us, if we can discern the repression through the public relations of "defence" and "security."
* The writer is coordinator of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions and editor of News From Within.
© Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||
| ARCHIVES Letter from the Editor Editorial Board Subscription Advertise! |
WEEKLY ONLINE: www.ahram.org.eg/weekly Updated every Saturday at 11.00 GMT, 2pm local time weeklyweb@ahram.org.eg |
Al-Ahram Organisation |