Sunday,23 September, 2018
Current issue | Issue 1230, (22 - 28 January 2015)
Sunday,23 September, 2018
Issue 1230, (22 - 28 January 2015)

Ahram Weekly

On the murders at Charlie Hebdo

Many have called on Islam to re-examine its precepts following the Paris attacks, but simple murderers cannot be understood to represent the religion, writes James Zogby

Al-Ahram Weekly

The perpetrators of the horror at Charlie Hebdo were not devout Muslims outraged by insults directed at their faith. They were not motivated by religious piety, nor did they seek to strike a blow at “freedom of expression.” Rather, they were crude political actors who planned an act of terror, seeking to create the greatest possible impact. They were murderers, plain and simple.

I believe in freedom of expression but with freedom also comes responsibility. Pope Francis got it right when he said, “You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others.”

At the same time, I am horrified by the outrageous killing of innocent journalists. As Francis added, “One cannot offend, make war, kill in the name of one’s religion — that is, in the name of God. To kill in the name of God is an aberration.”

It is wrong to insult. But the greater wrong is to kill those who insult you, especially if you claim to do it in God’s name.

As profoundly wrong as the killings at Charlie Hebdo were, the murders at a Parisian kosher market were even more despicable. They were motivated by the crudest form of anti-Semitism: killing Jews just because they were Jews and were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

What should be clear is that France has a problem. Most Muslims in France come from former French colonies, where France’s behaviour was often brutal. During the colonial period the Algerians were denied their identity, their language and their rights.

The French treated these Arabs as less than human. Two generations later, these once-colonised Algerians have come to France seeking jobs and opportunity. Instead, they find themselves trapped in poverty, as part of a permanent underclass.

It is important to understand this context in order to grasp the humiliation felt by many French Muslims when they see their religion denigrated by the country’s elite intellectuals. This, of course, in no way excuses the horrible murders at Charlie Hebdo. The terrorists hijacked not only the religion of Islam, but also the hurt other Muslims have felt at the insults directed at the faith by the dominant secular French culture.

The hurt is legitimate; the terrorist killings are not.

France has another problem. It welcomes immigrants but it does not respect them or absorb them. As President Barack Obama eloquently pointed out at a press conference this week, immigrants come to the US and within a generation become American and make their way up the ladder of social and economic mobility.

This is so for two reasons. First, despite the ranting of some bigots, the idea of “being American” is not an ethnic-based identity. It is a concept that continues to change over time. Immigrants become American and, in the process, expand the very definition of what it means to be an American.

After all, what is American music, cuisine, fashion, humour, etc? It is an amalgam of all of the cultures that have been absorbed in the evolving American identity: Jewish, Italian, Irish, African American, Hispanic, German, Native American and so many more.

The second reason is tragic. When immigrants come to America they do not start at the bottom precisely because America has a pre-existing underclass of Blacks and Hispanics, many of whom have been locked in poverty for generations (if not centuries).

This is not the case in Europe, where immigrants have become the underclass and are not absorbed into a culture that changes with them. Arabs have been in France for generations, as have Turks and Kurds in Germany and South Asians in the UK.

They remain Arabs or Muslims, Turks or “Pakis”. They are told, “Become like us if you want to be a part of us.” And yet, because being French or German or British remain ethnic-based identities, immigrants find that they can never “be like them.”

In the days that followed the Paris murders there were a number of articles that, after pointing to conflicts raging from Iraq to Libya, called on Muslims to “re-examine their religion” and its “penchant for violence and intolerance.” Even though a few of these commentaries may have been well meaning, they were wrong and evidence of a deeper prejudice against the religion of Islam.

In the last century, Europe was the scene of two bloody world wars that killed tens of millions. The continent gave birth to fascism in Spain, Italy and Germany, and to Communism and violent anarchism. It also saw the expansion of Europe’s colonial enterprise in Africa, Asia and the Arab world, with horrific and shameful violence in their ultimately failed efforts to subdue the indigenous peoples who resisted subordination.

During all that time and even now, have we ever asked Christianity to re-examine itself? Did we ever suggest that this mass murderous rampage that engulfed a continent had its roots in a religion that glorified conquest and blessed oppression and racism?

And when then US president George W Bush told us that God called him to go to Iraq, when clergy blessed the war effort, when there has been no accountability for the horrors of Abu Ghraib and torture, or the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqis and thousands of Americans in what can only be described as a failed war based on a lie, were Christians called upon to re-examine the principles of our faith?

The simple truth is that murderers and presidents, governments and groups may use the evocative power of religious language to justify their behaviour. The problem is not in the language or the religion. The problem is with those who abuse it for their evil ends.

The source of the current violence is to be found not in Islam but in the conditions that exist in the countries from which those who abuse Islam come, whether it is discrimination and humiliation, extreme deprivation and oppression, occupation or other forms of severe dislocation that result in aberrant, anti-social behaviour.

This doesn’t absolve those who respond to such conditions with violence. But our condemnation should be precise. They are not Muslim or Christian or Jewish or Hindu or Buddhist murderers or terrorists. Rather, they are murderers or terrorists who defile the language of religion in a vain effort to justify their violence.

The writer is president of the Arab American Institute.

add comment

  • follow us on